Search of decisions

Today's problem of mankind associated with the oncological pandemic lies at the basis of a misunderstanding of the field and energy nature of living things. This statement can cause a wave of objections, where objective, positive arguments for medical science will abound. Most of them we can certainly agree with. But the essence of this problem is not what medicine has already achieved, but what it cannot achieve yet, due to the specific features of its foundation.It so happened that a person is unable to see nature as a holistic phenomenon, which could then be decomposed into puzzles. The past division of sciences into specializations, today has created a problem where it is difficult to determine the end of the field of biochemistry and the beginning of the field of physics, mathematics, and even more so astrophysics.For example, the existence of a science like astrobiology is limited to the simple questions of whether there is life elsewhere and whether humans can survive in deep space. But we cannot understand the informational density of such a phenomenon as psychosensory. We could not see and understand the relationship between the astrophysical determinant and its quantum transformation in the biological environment.So, one of the main reasons for the misunderstanding of the nature of the oncological process is precisely the basis for the isolation of medical science in the dimensions of optical analysis technologies. Since vision is a powerful instrument of emotion, its binocular basis largely determined the physiological, orbital dependence of the brain on the total integration of substantial objects. That is why an emotional image, as an object of a neural matrix, is poorly written mathematically when creating artificial intelligence.Therefore, all of today's advances in medical science are determined by the rational advances of what is clearly visible, or observable within a binocular microscope. Today it already observes and fixes quantum...

"Oncology is a shear disease, which is a bridge between two worlds - plants and animals." B.V.BolotovModern civilization, in its overwhelming mass, has perceived the phenomenon of life as something running, floating and jumping. Through Hemingway's mouth, this formed an image: - I live only when I feel and experience. But even with the static of emotional and life processes, they nevertheless go on. Therefore, life from the angle of consciousness and life as a phenomenon are different categories from philosophy and biology.Based on this premise, for further understanding of this article, it is necessary to formulate the starting foundations of the phenomenon of life in general. This is any energy, informational, biophysical and biochemical exchange, in the cyclic connection of protein molecules. Yes, in this ornate formulation there is no human prerogative, but it is precisely such an emphasis that makes it possible to comprehend that the rationality of nature is present in any process of interaction of proteins with sunlight.Therefore, we can safely state that the primary civilization of plants and the secondary civilization of living beings live on Earth. One develops on the basis of the processes of photosynthesis, with the absorption of photons of sunlight, and the other on the processes of beta synthesis, with the absorption of electrons from sunlight. These are two opposite systems for which the sun is the God of physical life. But the primary vegetative form of life is indifferent to the secondary animal form of life, the apex of which is man. The plant world has existed for millions of years without us and could continue to exist. But living beings cannot exist without the plant world, since the oxygen necessary for the life of living beings is a by-product of photosynthesis.Therefore, the secondary civilization of living beings retained a biological guide, which, under certain conditions, allows the formation of the process of photosynthesis in the...

“The problem of aging, like the problem of cancer, lies in stereochemistry of molecular matter!“ Gilbert LingIn recent years, the issue of becoming sour or alkalized has acquired a sharpness in society, which has formed into an urgent question - what to do? But the very formulation of the question, either-or, is fundamentally wrong and erroneous from the very beginning. Most people are arranged in such a way that their worldview base is based on a chain of small, usually emotional choices, or fragmentary information. This is due to the physiological characteristics of the nervous organization. The experience of visual summation of perspective points of external space formed the psychological summation of worldview choices.This is why most people choose from several extreme points, not being able to think in a matrix. People always choose a mono-priority, in the form of a favorite character in a novel, the best politician, actor or football club. Often this manifests itself in aggressive forms - are you for the whites or for the reds, are you a believer or not? Exactly the same situation either - or has developed in the question - to become sour, or alkalized. The body is a complex system of balances, where the two extreme elements control and complement each other.Perhaps this is fear from the horrifying statistics of the growth of cancer, with the search for simple methods of prevention. Perhaps this is a new feature of society to think about approaching old age in advance. Perhaps these are signs of the beginning of disappointment, unjustified expectations from medicine.Certainly, modern information capabilities allow any person to put their five cents into the problems of society. And this has created some problems of choice, since the lack of a level of special knowledge determines the emotional choices of people. A simple principle often works here - if I don’t understand, then it’s not mine and it doesn’t suit me. So why is the formulation of...

"It's hard to find a black cat in a dark room, but that doesn't mean it's not there!" Confucius improvisationToday, medicine can detect a cancerous process when it has already been localized in the tissues of the body, or has given the first signs of changes in the mucous layer. Before that, he quietly, latently begins many, many years before the diagnostic trouble, since in medical science there is still no substantiated etiological theory of its nature. This means that there are no signs of its early fixation, even at the level of microscopic comparisons. As they say, you don't know what to look for and what to see.Therefore, today, the entire methodological set is effective and error-free only when there is something to consider, pinch off and take material for research. But these are always already phases of a localized form of the process, which, before that, develops in the body for 7-8 years. As you know, almost all existing tumor markers are far from always informative and may be normal, even when, for example, colonoscopy or MSCT already detects oncology and the onset of metastasis.Therefore, it is meaningless to talk about modern screening at the level of the preventive stage, or the stage of secondary risk, after full courses of treatment. All these unconditionally necessary measures, unfortunately, are already fixing, albeit small, but already formed formations. Therefore, today the practice of preventive surgery is being widely introduced, which involves cutting off any tubercle, in fear that it may degenerate into oncology. This is precisely the mistake, since approximately 80% of the total distance of the process falls on a latent, symptom-free period.The first shifts of an organism into photosynthesis form new relationships and balance between various substances in it. First of all, this concerns amino acids and microelements, which are always determined in any kind of synthesis. This means that there are dominant groups of trace elements...

Official oncological medicine and alternative cancer treatments, existing outside the confines of conventional medicine, engage in a mutual exchange of accusations, both lacking substantial scientific rationale regarding the nature of malignancy within the framework of natural laws. Ironically, both sides are bound by a singular utopian belief: that since cancer thrives in an acidic environment, the remedy lies in alkalizing your body. This notion is fervently embraced by doctors, alternative healers, and the majority of individuals seeking self-healing solutions online.For those seeking cancer prevention or exploring self-healing options on the internet, the journey may lead to a dead end. Mainstream medicine views tumors primarily as surgical targets, with well-established post-operative therapies. However, the vast expanse of the internet offers millions of patients an array of eccentric remedies, often without a comprehensive understanding of cancer. Today, instead of the outdated approaches involving hydrogen peroxide and baking soda, there's a burgeoning trend towards chlorophyll. Yet, few comprehend or communicate that chlorophyll directly stimulates the oncological process in any organism.I'm prepared to present a rather contentious viewpoint. Regrettably, mainstream medicine has yet to propose a scientifically sound alternative for the treatment of oncology. However, beyond its confines, where the pursuit of non-medical oncological alternatives flourishes, there exists a profound misunderstanding regarding the nature of cancer, its underlying mechanisms, and the efficacy of various methodologies.I firmly believe that this overarching issue can only be addressed through the lens of science, drawing upon current knowledge and future advancements. Though the prospect may seem as distant as apple trees blossoming on Mars, it's increasingly evident that within the realm of cancer research, such achievements are indeed feasible.The method of cancer treatment...

The current enzyme therapy was formed as answers to endless questions that have accumulated over the centuries in the inquisitive minds of various priests, healers and the first universal scientists. The experimental selection of all kinds of substances for the preparation of medicines with their quick and visible effectiveness, without understanding the mechanisms of its action, eventually made me think about the invisible power of all these juices, elixirs and decoctions. Just a couple of centuries ago, the happy minds of natural scientists did not know that there is a whole world of microsubstances that are the dynamic basis of all life. These substances were called enzymes, and the scientific direction was called enzymology. Today's development of this young science, to a greater extent, is determined not by old questions, but by the answers received to them with the understanding that the abyss of the microworld has opened before us. Every specialist involved in research in the field of nymology clearly understands the decisive role that enzymes will play in the development of future treatments for various diseases. Rapidly developing immunology predicts that the victory over oncological diseases lies not in the field of chemotherapy or radiation, but in the field of immunotherapy with a decisive role of enzymes. Currently, many leading laboratories in the world have made this area a priority in their research and pharmaceutical development. The use of enzyme mixtures in the most complex metabolic disorders gives amazing results, instilling confidence that we are a few scientific steps away from fundamentally new methods of treatment.Rene Antoine de Réaumur (1683 -1757), a Parisian, was one of those scientists whose universality in our time of narrow specialization is hard to imagine. He was at the same time a physicist, technician and naturalist, although he gained the greatest fame as an entomologist. In the last years of his life, Reaumur came to the...