Medical care

Perhaps, after reading a series of my articles, someone will have the opinion that in relation to medicine I have chosen an accusatory tone. This is not true. The statement that medical science is slowly absorbing the features of stereochemistry in relation to oncology is not an accusation, but the need to articulate the expansion of the scope of its potential. So far, the best materials in this area are published only by chemists, physicists, and even technologists from oil companies. It is clear that this gold dust will settle in the minds of biochemists and pharmacists, but how many decades will we have to wait until this is formulated into protocols for oncologists. In the meantime, the heads of biochemists are busy with questions about where the cancer cell has legs and arms and where in the helix the gene mutates. And the Nobel Prizes are given precisely for such answers. Well, we will kill this ill-fated gene, board up the windows of the door and wait for it to emerge from its remission again.When I think of the professionally traumatized souls of oncologists meeting and seeing off their patients, I associate it with front-line nurses carrying the hopelessly wounded from the battlefield on their fragile shoulders. And it is from this angle that I would like to once again note the honest, professional and civil formulation of David Agus - “The body does not get cancer, but produces it”!!!If there are no congenital genetic defects affecting digestion in our body and it has not received serious exogenous holes, then the cancerous process is always determined by a metabolic disorder in the context of the condition and capabilities of our intestines. It is he who is the front door, where oncology and its development further branches into a local disease in a specific place and organ. Therefore, it is the intestines that is the "holy cow" of our body, in which the oncological process takes the first step towards diversity.Causes of cancer in general,...

Modern medicine has made a theoretical intervention in society about the causes of cancer. It turns out that the oncological process is an age-related inevitability and each of us will live to see his cancer. Moreover, medicine has put an increase in life expectancy to its credit, but as a result, humanity has lived up to oncology. Dissenters are hinted that it is possible to die earlier. Such a casuistic move relieves medical science of responsibility for the lack of a fundamental theory of the onset of cancer. I am especially surprised that even biochemically educated youth, who are promoting the idea of ​​how to stop human aging, also fell for this cartoon.Moreover, even the prehistory, where the term itself came from, is summed up. It turns out that in ancient times someone lived to be 50 years old and they noticed this crab, which, at the suggestion of the Latins, became cancer. Of course, mutational changes, when the isoelectric point in the chain of amino acids shifted from its axis, the process of photosynthesis began in the body. And this could have happened several thousand years ago, depending on how that person lived, ate, worked and emotionally.If you open the official statistics of the WHO and look at the peak point of diseases - lung cancer, or any other type of cancer, then this milestone fluctuates around 50 years. This is also confirmed in countries with high life expectancy, where the incidence rate drops sharply after 56 years. If you look at children's hematological centers around the world, then at the age of 12 most of them become old people. And when they tell me about the past, in it I clearly remember the women and grandfathers who stacked hay in their 80s. And they did not die from oncology, but shriveled from sarcopenia.In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when people were also dabbled in cigars and shag, in medical schools in the United States, cancer patients were shown as a rare curiosity. At the same time, students were...

Bolotov School. Probably, of all the varieties of oncological diseases, breast cancer and pediatric hematology occupy the leading places in the hierarchy of social phobias. There are many reasons for this. And first of all, the fact that every, especially a young woman, is a mother and an object of aesthetic plasticity, where the female breast occupies both of these places. For many women, a mirror is a close friend and any plastic defect depressingly hurts tender women's hearts. That is why there are a lot of psychological support programs for women who have gone through the oncological pipeline of medicine.I am not in favor of spreading horrors about modern methods of treatment, and even more so about doctors, since they are only a dependent technological appendage of pharmaceutical hopelessness. But it is essential to point out the illusion of hope that breast cancer chemotherapy is for the masses of women. I know that many will wisely object to me, recalling the aphorism “We can, we can”. But for my part, I want to remind everyone that “Water does not flow under a lying stone.”Modern medical science, not knowing the natural mechanism of oncological diseases, has offered society a whole list of secondary factors that cannot be combined into a common knot of genetic cell transformation.Aunt Pronya can read in every newspaper today that breast cancer is: the onset of menstruation before the age of 12; the onset of menopause later than 55 years; late birth after 35 years; abortions and miscarriages; irregular sex life; improper use of oral contraceptives; stressful working and living conditions; smoking; alcohol intake and injury, probably drunk. And this list ends with horror stories about heredity.Yes, here's another young neighbor consecrated Aunt Pronya with the Internet, that, they say, soda should be saved from this sexual and alcohol defeat. And "it seems that you are helping the Italians." The Internet has stuffed the brains of many, even...

Having watched for many years how people troll everyone who tries to tell them something important, I guess that this article of mine will cause a special enthusiasm for swearing and hatred, especially among women with a puritanical understanding - my man in my life and society. This irritant always pops up next to the topic of diseases of the reproductive organs in men - the prostate.I remember once I came across a website with an article about prostate cancer written by a female urologist who gave men preventive advice to touch their organ less. What a wonderful example of professional misandry. And most importantly, it is immediately clear what the treatment of a malignant tumor of the prostate will be - castration by all available methods, so that there is no need to touch it.Medical science knows more about prostate cancer than any other type of cancer. But for various reasons, there remains a large gap between the scientific understanding of the problem and the methods that medicine uses. This is a general phenomenon seen in medical approaches to many diseases. If you have nerves, your brains will be blocked with a psychotropic drug, if you have pressure, adrenaline will drop to zero, if you have gastritis, you will destroy the acidic function of digestion, but if you have a tumor, then you will definitely have it removed.Yes, for many tumors this is the first necessity, but prostate surgery is not at all a mandatory measure, since even with histological confirmation of malignancy in 85% of cases, the disease is in an indolent, potentially safe form. Considering that the disease more often overtakes older men, then both medicine and society are always radically categorical: why does he need these prichandaly, his life is ending anyway - let them operate.In previous articles, I already wrote that medical science does not understand the cause and oncological mechanism before gene mutation. But at the level of already genetic disorders, a lot of interesting...

Bolotov School. Philip Day American publicist who has written a number of books that reveal the true face of the modern pharmaceutical businessIn 1996, scientists at McGill Cancer Centers had a good idea: they decided to find out if doctors treating their cancer patients with chemotherapy would choose this method for themselves if they got cancer. They sent questionnaires to 118 doctors who treated non-small cell lung tumors. 79 questionnaires were filled. Sixty-four out of seventy-nine physicians spoke out against a trial of cisplatin (Cisplatin), which is used in chemotherapy. 58 physicians found all types of trial treatments unacceptable. What was the basis? Inefficiency of chemotherapy and exorbitantly high degree of toxicity!John Cairns, professor of microbiology at Harvard University, already in 1985 stated in Scientific American: of cancers encountered, no relationship can be drawn between sudden changes in mortality rates and chemotherapeutic treatments.Certain rare cancers are excluded from this statement.Evidence that widespread cancers can be cured by chemotherapy has yet to be presented. The testimony of honest and fearless doctors and researchers against the effectiveness of chemotherapy spans many pages in both books. Chemotherapy helps to shrink the tumor, but this does not mean that the patient is cured or prolongs his life. There are two more statements to be made here. Dr. Alan C. Nixon, former president of the American Chemical Society, stated, "As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me how physicians can ignore the indisputable facts that chemotherapy does more harm than good." And Dr. Ralph Moss, deputy director of community affairs at Memorial Sloan Kettering Hospital in Manhattan, the most famous research institute in the US, says: “There is no evidence that chemotherapy prolongs the life of the patient in most cases. This is the BIG LIE around this topic, namely that there should be a direct relationship...

The first euphoric hopes in the search for methods of treating oncological diseases arose in the 40s of the twentieth century, when, during the Second World War, they began to study in more detail the effect of chemical warfare agents on the body: mustard gas S(CH2CH2CI) 2 (mustard gas) and nitrogen mustard RN(CH2CH2CI)2 (trichloroethylamine). It is a chemical warfare agent. In the human body, mustard gas reacts with the NH groups of nucleotides that make up DNA. This contributes to the formation of cross-links between DNA strands, due to which this section of DNA becomes inoperable. For the first time as a chemical weapon of mass destruction, it was used by Germany against the Anglo-French troops, in 1917, near the Belgian city of Ypres, which determined the name of this substance.According to the Chemical Encyclopedia, mustard gas is an active protoplasmic poison that only a gas mask and chemical protective clothing can protect against. It is included in the list of substances that were tested on concentration camp prisoners during the Second World War, in order to obtain scientific information for geneticists and pharmaceutical companies. Behind the pharmaceutical modification of mustard gas, what is called cytostatics in medicine today, tens of thousands of tortured destinies are hidden. New generation drugs used today in oncology as alkylating agents are derivatives of the same mustard gas. Severe, irreversible side effects that occur after the use of these so-called (medicinal) substances are divided into immediate complications, immediate complications and delayed, long-term complications.Immediate complications (vomiting, nausea, drug fever, hypotensive syndrome, various types of allergic reactions) are observed in the first hours after drug administration. Immediate complications (myelodepression, dyspeptic syndrome, neurological disorders, toxic lesions of the urinary system, damage to the pancreas, lung and myocardial damage, immunosuppression) appear...

Worldwide WHO statistics as of the end of 2018 show that among all types of cancer in women, cancer of the body and cervix is ​​13%, ovarian cancer 5%, vaginal cancer 1.5% Thus, the proportion of oncological diseases of the gynecological system is 19.5% of all types of cancer in women. This means that out of five women diagnosed with cancer, one has cancer through gynecology.If you look at statistics by type of cancer lesions in the female system, then cervical cancer is 44.8%, cancer of the body of the uterus 18.1%, ovarian cancer 29.7% and 7.4% in total are cancer of the vagina, vulva, fallopian tubes, choriocarcinoma. p> If you look at age statistics, oncology in the female system is most common starting from the period before menopause, in menopause and after menopause, reaching its peak by 60-65 years. But at the same time, it should be noted that 36% of all cancer cases in the female system occur at the age of 30-45 years. See chart.The worst cancer situation in the female system is in Bolivia, Indonesia, Laos, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, England, Norway, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Dagestan. The most favorable situation for this group of diseases is in Egypt, the Congo, and the Republic of Niger. China also belongs to this group, although for most other oncological diseases, China is in the world's leading five. The situation is also less favorable in Iran, Syria, Libya, Morocco and Malawi.It is not necessary to say that non-developed countries are more susceptible to oncology. Developed countries are abundantly present on this list, although I have not mentioned all of them. In other matters, you yourself can look at the map compiled by the World Health Organization for the gynecological group of diseases based on the results of 2018.The reproductive system, in both men and women, has an amazing ability to respond to alternative therapies. This is largely due to the active blood flow in the reproductive systems of...

Chart of female hormone fluctuations throughout the cycleConsidering that almost all women have a secretion stage that lasts 14 days + 1 day, then the lengthening of the menstrual cycle always occurs due to the proliferation stage. Therefore, when calculating the days of hormone delivery and determining the day of ovulation, it is necessary to subtract the number 15 from the total number of cycle days. This will be the day of ovulation. Further, to determine the day of completion of the formation of the corpus luteum, it is necessary to add the number 7 to the day of ovulation at 28-32 days of the cycle and the number 8 at 33-35 days of the cycle. If the cycle days are more than 35, then it is necessary to determine the duration of the formation of the corpus luteum using ultrasound.The reproductive system is closely related to the function of the thyroid gland, which is included in the triangle of interconnection: ovaries - pituitary gland - thyroid gland. Therefore, it is necessary to know the plants that depress the thyroid gland. And if, if necessary, to regulate the level of hormones of the thyroid gland is problematic, then thyreostatic plants cannot be used. But they are effective for toxic goiter and elevated levels of TSH, AT and AT-TPO.These are antithyroid substances that depress the thyroid gland, contributing to the formation of goiter.Many plants from the lamb and cruciferous family contain thyreostatic substances that promote the development of goiter and thyrotoxication. So, mustard oils of various cruciferous plants can cleave off thiocyanogen in the body, which contributes to the formation of goiter. Of particular interest are also cruciferous glucosides (aglucones) contained in various types of cabbage, which are combined under the collective name "brassica factor". The most important representative of these compounds is goitrin, isolated for the first time in 1949 from cabbage and swede seeds (5-vinyl-2-thiooxyzolidinone), which is formed from...